Loading...

News

Auctioning Off College Admissions Seats?

April 2, 2019
by Susan Dutca-Lovell
Auctioning Off College Admissions Seats?

Why not have schools auction off college seats to the highest bidder? The question was posed by a senior vice president at the Harvard Management Company on his public LinkedIn page amid the recent national college admissions cheating scandal. According to Michael Cappucci, it is simply "an honest question." He goes on to ask, "Why do we have a system where wealthy parents have to make shady payments to even more shady intermediaries to get their kids into college?" The post, which has since been removed but still drew much online anger was authored by Cappucci who is "not a top official" at the company; many people still presumed Harvard is connected to his idea, according to Inside Higher Ed, but Harvard was quick to distance itself from the LinkedIn post.

In a way, one might argue the idea of auctioning off admissions slots is not that far-fetched, especially when you consider that colleges - who have already filled up slots designated for students who require financial aid - also reserve space for families that do not require financial need. In these cases, wealth is "the deciding factor" in filling the remaining seats. Therefore, perhaps an auction would be a more transparent way for wealthier families to "compete with the 'charade' of the status quo," according to Cappucci. While the proposal may not be "socially just," it would at least be "as socially just and more transparent than is the current system." Besides, we may as well "force the wealthy to pay more for their good fortune," stated Robert Samuelson, an economics columnist who proposed a similar system.

How would an ideal bidding system exist? For starters, students would have to "meet the school's high academic standards;" bargaining would not be permitted, as "the award of admissions sports would be strictly determined by the price offered;" and preference for children of alumni would not be allowed (also known as legacy admissions.)

Furthermore, all winning bids would be required to pay, so that if the applicant applied to multiple schools but chose one, they would still have to pay their winning bids for all of the other schools. This would help more than just the wealthy, as auction revenue could be funneled into scholarships for the poor and middle class, bringing "more, not less, equality."

Those who advocate for the auctioning of college seats are asking: "Would they be worse than a situation where wealthy donors' children are admitted without any transparency?" Yes or no? Why or why not? Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Getting more college financial aid doesn’t have to be a relentless search. Scholarships.com is totally free. Connect with our massive database of millions of college scholarships at any time by searching for awards in a variety of ways. Scholarships.com offers the quickest and easiest way to search for, apply to, and win college scholarships. Start making your college education affordable or perhaps even free, by conducting a free college scholarship search at Scholarships.com.

DISCUSS

Share your thoughts and perhaps thousands of students will benefit from your unique insight on the subject!

If you can read this, don't touch the following fields


5 Comment(s)

Anonymous  on  5/16/2019 4:17:35 PM

While the solution that "there are no free rides" might be ideal for some, isn't that the point of private, rich kid tutoring? To give the kid and academic advantage? I think the extra transparency could be nice, but schools can't be forced to give all equally. If you have more money and/or bring more fame, the school benefits more from your presence. At least the facade gives the impression that the admission process is fair... I guess the free market does ensure that this would never happen, as the bad press from any school actually doing this would be enough to form a backlash that would make getting into the school undesirable...

nothanks  on  4/9/2019 8:55:22 PM

This seems like it would be a better system than the one in place now, but better doesn't equal best, or even good. Even if this system was implemented, what's stopping the rich kids who don't qualify from going back to shady deals? The problem here isn't rich kids who meet the requirements (although that can be a problem at times, it's a different conversation), the current problem is rich kids who don't meet the requirements trying to bribe their way into a school they wouldn't otherwise be able to get into.

Kurt H  on  4/8/2019 2:09:51 PM

I am sorry, but this suggestion is absolutely ludicrous!! Whatever happened to the idea that one EARNS their way in life. There are no free rides. Every high school student should have the same opportunity at higher education regardless of Mommy and Daddy's income level. If you can't make the grade, maybe it's time for Mommy and Daddy to stop babying their kids and teach how to work harder and earn it!!!!

Shelley S  on  4/7/2019 10:29:07 PM

Haven’t the spots at elite schools been essentially auctioned off for years...? If you donate enough money to the school, you’re buying your kid a spot there.

Mai  on  4/2/2019 6:20:38 PM

Well this idea is sure going to make it easier for this country's elites get ALL of the seats. If everyone meets the schools requirements, so that it is an even playing field, then the only differential will be the cash. There you have it! It's the have's against the have not's. The elites win again!

Trending News Articles